MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112088456 · doi:10.1080/01490400701544659

Mothers and Daughters: Teaching and Learning about Leisure

2008· article· en· W2112088456 on OpenAlex
Charlene S. Shannon, Susan Shaw

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueLeisure Sciences · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDaughterPsychologyDevelopmental psychologySocial psychologyLeisure timeLeisure activitySociology of leisureSociologyPhysical activityMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study focused on understanding what role mothers play in developing their daughters' leisure attitudes, values and behaviors. A group of Canadian women and their adult children were studied to determine what daughters learned from their mothers about leisure. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 mother-daughter dyads. Mothers provided explicit and intentional messages about leisure that daughters evaluated and interpreted along with the behaviors they observed in their mothers. Evaluations and interpretations of these messages contributed to what daughters learned about leisure and how they came to incorporate leisure into their lives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it