MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112100398 · doi:10.1002/qj.2606

On the use of simulated photon paths to co‐register top‐of‐atmosphere radiances in <i>EarthCARE</i> radiative closure experiments

2015· article· en· W2112100398 on OpenAlexaff
Florian Tornow, Howard W. Barker, Carlos Doménech

Bibliographic record

VenueQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric aerosols and clouds
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiative transferRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric radiative transfer codesRadiometerCloud topAtmosphere (unit)MeteorologySatelliteRadianceCloud computingComputer scienceGeologyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Earth's Cloud, Aerosol and Radiation Explorer (EarthCARE) mission will retrieve vertical profiles of cloud and aerosol properties by combining data from active and passive instruments. The verisimilitude of retrievals will be assessed using data from its broad‐band radiometer (BBR), which measures top‐of‐atmosphere (TOA) short‐wave (SW) radiances at three along‐track viewing angles. BBR measurements will be compared with their modelled counterparts, simulated by a three‐dimensional (3D) Monte Carlo (MC) radiative transfer model acting on retrieved properties, thus defining a radiative closure experiment. Since cloud and aerosol microphysical and hence optical properties within each assessment domain vary horizontally and vertically, one challenge facing the closure process is selection of radiances that will foster the best assessments of retrievals. This study investigates whether co‐registration of radiances for closure assessment can be aided by information pertaining to photon paths from the MC model. Unlike methods that provide one effective reflecting layer (ERL), such as cloud‐top altitude, simulated photon paths can account for several reflecting layers. For this study, A‐Train satellite data provided cloud properties. The MC model was applied to this field to simulate BBR‐like measurements. Cloud properties were then perturbed randomly, to represent retrievals in approximate fashion, and the MC model reapplied to them. The resulting sets of radiances mimicked EarthCARE measured and modelled data, thus allowing a test of closure and co‐registration methodologies. Through the use of 3D photon path information, the rate of identification of inaccurate cloud retrievals improved over ERL approaches by ∼4% for cirrus clouds and ∼15% for broken clouds. For large‐scale deep convective clouds, however, inaccurate photon paths, ostensibly due to poor retrievals, reduced identification performance by 3%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological SocietySame topicAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsFrench-language works237,207