MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Walking the Integration Talk: An ArtSci Project

2013· article· en· W2112101351 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Education and Development
Canadian institutionsNipissing University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe artsPedagogySociologyHumanitiesMathematics educationPsychologyArtVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As teacher educators, we help prepare elementary generalist teacher-candidates (TCs) for traditional classrooms. In those classrooms, subjects are often taught in isolation rather than as integrated concepts and this practice is reflected in the program at the university where we teach art and science education. Because the world is multidimensional, interconnected, and complex, we created a project that integrates art and science learning as a way to prepare future teachers to provide relevant educational experiences for their students. Data, in the form of reflection papers prepared by the TCs, were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Emergent topics resulted in four propositions that summarize the findings. They all speak to the value of an integrated education experience for TCs. This experience provides different opportunities for learning, offers cognitive “disruption”, enables TCs to articulate pedagogy of integration, and can impact practice and program positively. In addition, three elements essential to an integration project at the tertiary level are identified. En tant qu’éducateurs d’enseignants, nous participons à la préparation de candidats en éducation qui se destinent à devenir des enseignants généralistes. Dans ces salles de classe, les matières sont généralement enseignées isolément plutôt qu’en tant que concepts intégrés et cette pratique se reflète dans le programme universitaire où nous enseignons les arts et les sciences de l’éducation. Comme le monde est multidimensionnel, interconnecté et complexe, nous avons créé un projet qui intègre l’apprentissage des arts et des sciences d’une manière qui va préparer les futurs enseignants à fournir à leurs élèves des expériences d’enseignement pertinentes. Les données, sous forme de travaux de réflexion préparés par les étudiants en éducation, ont été analysées selon une théorie à base empirique. Des thèmes émergents ont été identifiés dans quatre propositions qui résument les résultats. Elles illustrent toutes la valeur d’une expérience d’enseignement intégré pour les étudiants en éducation. Cette expérience présente des possibilités d’apprentissage différentes et peut avoir des effets positifs sur la pratique et sur les programmes. De plus, elle identifie trois éléments essentiels pour préparer un projet d’intégration au niveau tertiaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.713
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0110.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it