MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112266133 · doi:10.1109/pacrim.2009.5291238

Teaching old caches new tricks: RegionTracker and predictor virtualization

2009· article· en· W2112266133 on OpenAlexaff
Ioana Burcea, Jason Zebchuk, Andreas Moshovos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCacheVirtualizationMetadataExploitOperating systemGranularityBus sniffingCache pollutionCache algorithmsCPU cacheParallel computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On-chip last-level caches are increasing to tens of megabytes to accommodate applications with large memory footprints and to compensate for high memory latencies and limited off-chip bandwidth. This paper reviews two on-going research efforts that exploit such large caches: coarse-grain cache management, and predictor virtualization. Coarse-grain cache management collects and stores cache information at a large memory region granularity (e.g., 1 KB to 8 KB). This coarse view of memory access behaviour enables optimizations that were not previously possible with conventional caches. Predictor virtualization is motivated by the observation that on-chip storage has become sufficiently large to accommodate allocating, on demand, a small percentage of its capacity for purposes other than storing program data and instructions. Predictor virtualization uses conventional caches to store program metadata, i.e., information about program behaviour. Such metadata information can be used for several optimizations that improve performance and power. This paper summarizes the progress made and the on-going activity in these two research efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.008
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207