MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112271096 · doi:10.1109/tap.2011.2158946

Millimeter-Wave High Radiation Efficiency Planar Waveguide Series-Fed Dielectric Resonator Antenna (DRA) Array: Analysis, Design, and Measurements

2011· article· en· W2112271096 on OpenAlex
Wael M. Abdel‐Wahab, Dan Busuioc, Safieddin Safavi‐Naeini

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsDielectric resonator antennaHFSSRadiation patternAntenna efficiencyPlanar arrayAntenna gainReflection coefficientAntenna (radio)Extremely high frequencyAntenna arrayRadiationMaterials scienceResonatorPhysicsMicrostrip antennaComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A low cost general architecture for a substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) series-fed dielectric resonator antenna (DRA) array, formed by two different slot polarizations, is proposed. In addition, a novel, simple, and generic transmission line (T.L.) circuit model, along with a fast and generic formulation for the new linear array antenna, is developed. The model can be used for reflection coefficient and radiation pattern (gain) calculations. The experimental data from two linear array modules, operating at the millimeter-wave band, are used to verify the simulated results of HFSS and the proposed model results. The measured radiation pattern for a 4 × 1 SIW-DRA array demonstrates a broadside beam with a radiated gain of 11.70 dB over an operating impedance bandwidth of 4.70%. Moreover, the simulated radiation efficiency is more than 90%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it