Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper examines the impact of the additive correlated noise on the accuracy of the signal reconstruction algorithm originating from the Whittaker-Shannon (WS) sampling interpolation formula. A class of band-limited signals as well as signals which are non-band-limited are taken into consideration. The proposed reconstruction method is a smooth post-filtering correction of the classical WS interpolation series. We assess both the point-wise and global accuracy of the proposed reconstruction algorithm for a broad class of dependent noise processes. This includes short and long-memory stationary errors being independent of the sampling rate. We also examine a class of noise processes for which the correlation function depends on the sampling rate. Whereas the short-memory errors have relatively small influence on the reconstruction accuracy, the long-memory errors can greatly slow down the convergence rate. In the case of the noise model depending on the sampling rate further degradation of the algorithm accuracy is observed. We give quantitative explanations of these phenomena by deriving rates at which the reconstruction error tends to zero. We argue that the obtained rates are close to be optimal. In fact, in a number of special cases they agree with known optimal min-max rates. The problem of the limit distribution of the L2distance of the proposed reconstruction algorithm is also addressed. This result allows us to tackle an important problem of designing non- parametric lack-of-fit tests. The theory of the asymptotic behavior of quadratic forms of stationary sequences is utilized in this case.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".