MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112282929 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1210580109

Perfusable branching microvessel bed for vascularization of engineered tissues

2012· article· en· W2112282929 on OpenAlexafffund
Loraine L. Y. Chiu, Miles Montgomery, Yan Liang, Haijiao Liu, Milica Radisic

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsHeart and Stroke FoundationUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCell biologyMicrovesselAngiogenesisChemistryConfocal microscopyIn vivoCD31BiophysicsAnatomyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vascularization is critical for the survival of engineered tissues in vitro and in vivo. In vivo, angiogenesis involves endothelial cell proliferation and sprouting followed by connection of extended cellular processes and subsequent lumen propagation through vacuole fusion. We mimicked this process in engineering an organized capillary network anchored by an artery and a vein. The network was generated by inducing directed capillary sprouting from vascular explants on micropatterned substrates containing thymosin β4-hydrogel. The capillary outgrowths connected between the parent explants by day 21, a process that was accelerated to 14 d by application of soluble VEGF and hepatocyte growth factor. Confocal microscopy and transmission electron microscopy indicated the presence of tubules with lumens formed by endothelial cells expressing CD31, VE-cadherin, and von Willebrand factor. Cardiac tissues engineered around the resulting vasculature exhibited improved functional properties, cell striations, and cell-cell junctions compared with tissues without prevascularization. This approach uniquely allows easy removal of the vasculature from the microfabricated substrate and easy seeding of the tissue specific cell types in the parenchymal space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations173
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topic3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207