MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112299160

An FPGA-based face detector using neural network and a scalable floating point unit

2006· article· en· W2112299160 on OpenAlexaff
Yong‐Soon Lee, Seok‐Bum Ko

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceField-programmable gate arrayFloating pointArtificial neural networkScalabilityReduction (mathematics)Floating-point unitArithmeticComputer hardwareFixed-point arithmeticArithmetic logic unitIEEE floating pointDetectorParallel computingAlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: The study implemented an FPGA-based face detector using Neural Networks and a scalable Floating Point arithmetic Unit (FPU). The FPU provides dynamic range and reduces the bit of the arithmetic unit more than fixed point method does. These features led to reduction in the memory so that it is efficient for neural networks system with large size data bits. The arithmetic unit occupies 39~45 % of the total neural networks system area. Therefore bits reduction is needed not only for memory but also for a FPU and system size. Reduction from FPU 32 bits (IEEE 754 single precision) to 16 bits reduced the size of memory and arithmetic units by 50%, having only 1.25 % deterioration in the detection rate. In order to determine the least and acceptable bits of the FPU, we examined how representation errors affect a detection rate through the MRRE. The scalable FPU and the error analysis may be useful to determine the details, especially area and speed of FPU for the embedded neural network system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207