MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112344597 · doi:10.5430/jst.v2n5p45

Breast conserving surgery and radiation as a choice for patients with BRCA mutations

2012· article· en· W2112344597 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Christine Pinto, Katherine Kotinsley, Mark Trombetta

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Solid Tumors · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBRCA gene mutations in cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMastectomyBreast cancerBreast-conserving surgeryProphylactic MastectomyGenetic testingBRCA mutationStandard of careOncologyGeneral surgeryGynecologySurgeryCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients who are diagnosed with early stage breast cancer and who test positive for the BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 genetic mutations have been considered better candidates for bilateral mastectomy (ipsilateral therapeutic and contralateral prophylactic) as an accepted standard of care as compared to breast conserving surgery. Recently the increasing evidence that mastectomy may not be required has prompted us to review the literature and develop evidence-based recommendations in order to allow patients the option of mastectomy avoidance as long as they are well-informed and agreeable to close surveillance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Solid TumorsSame topicBRCA gene mutations in cancerFrench-language works237,207