MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112352771 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.1996.593231

A neural network-based detection thresholding scheme for active sonar signal tracking

2002· article· en· W2112352771 on OpenAlexaff
Yajie Sun, M. Farooq

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadar Systems and Signal Processing
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThresholdingSonarComputer scienceConstant false alarm rateMarine mammals and sonarFalse alarmArtificial intelligenceEnergy (signal processing)Artificial neural networkNoise (video)UnderwaterSIGNAL (programming language)Tracking (education)Computer visionSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Real-time computingMathematicsTelecommunicationsStatisticsImage (mathematics)Geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intensity thresholding is an effective technique to cut off the low energy noises and cut down the computational load in an underwater target tracking system. A neural network based adaptive intensity thresholding scheme with a constant false alarm rate (CFAR) for an active sonar signal tracking situation in a realistic sea environment is proposed in this paper. The proposed system has the following advantages: (1) It performs well in a nonhomogenous sea environment; the false alarm rate is kept constant while the threshold changes with different sea environments; (2) It can adaptively estimate the threshold for different range cells because the noise under estimation is strictly local so that the received intensities of noise and targets are not affected by the distance they travel; and (3) The computational requirements are moderate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadar Systems and Signal ProcessingFrench-language works237,207