MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112364454 · doi:10.25080/majora-14bd3278-006

Hyperopt-Sklearn: Automatic Hyperparameter Configuration for Scikit-Learn

2014· article· en· W2112364454 on OpenAlexafffund
Brent Komer, James Bergstra, Chris Eliasmith

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Python in Science Conferences · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and Data Classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMNIST databaseHyperparameterComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePreprocessorMachine learningBenchmarkingClassifier (UML)Support vector machinePattern recognition (psychology)Data miningDeep learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hyperopt-sklearn is a new software project that provides automatic algorithm configuration of the Scikit-learn machine learning library.Following Auto-Weka, we take the view that the choice of classifier and even the choice of preprocessing module can be taken together to represent a single large hyperparameter optimization problem.We use Hyperopt to define a search space that encompasses many standard components (e.g.SVM, RF, KNN, PCA, TFIDF) and common patterns of composing them together.We demonstrate, using search algorithms in Hyperopt and standard benchmarking data sets (MNIST, 20-Newsgroups, Convex Shapes), that searching this space is practical and effective.In particular, we improve on best-known scores for the model space for both MNIST and Convex Shapes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.171

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0080.006
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.059

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations298
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Python in Science ConferencesSame topicMachine Learning and Data ClassificationFrench-language works237,207