MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112366121 · doi:10.1144/geochem.1.2.147

A fractal filtering technique for processing regional geochemical maps for mineral exploration

2001· article· en· W2112366121 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry Exploration Environment Analysis · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFractalGeologyMineral explorationFractal dimensionFractal analysisMultifractal systemField (mathematics)Transformation (genetics)Filter (signal processing)Spatial analysisAnomaly (physics)Remote sensingComputer scienceGeophysicsMathematicsComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A regional geochemical map interpolated from point data, usually sampled in surficial media such as stream sediments or lake sediments, may contain a large amount of information critical for mineral exploration and environmental studies. The geochemical map is, however, not ‘ready-to-use’ for such tasks as the determination of a local ‘anomaly’ or the characterization of a regional trend of one or more chemical elements as may be required for the purpose of mineral resource prediction. This becomes possible only after the map has been clearly divided into different components. Fractal filtering, a recently developed technique for decomposing a map or image into different components, helps to separate the anomaly from background or to extract other meaningful patterns from the geochemical map using both frequency and spatial information. The fractal filters are formed by applying the fractal concentration-area model to the power spectrum of the processed geochemical field. They often constitute a group of irregularly shaped filters in the frequency domain that can separate the domain of wave numbers into distinct regions, each with a power spectrum following a similar power-law or fractal property. The corresponding patterns of the separate components are obtained after transformation back to the spatial domain. The fractal filter can be applied to decompose the original geochemical field into a set of map components with distinct scaling ranges and anisotropy. The analysis of relationships among these decomposed maps can provide useful information for the interpretation and evaluation of anomalies or trends. This paper briefly introduces the theory behind the fractal filtering technique. A case study of regional geochemical data of lake sediments from western Meguma Terrain, Southern Nova Scotia, Canada, is used to illustrate application of this technique to process the regional geochemical maps of the study area for the prediction of the turbidite-hosted gold deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it