Three Forms of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone, Including a Novel Form, in a Basal Salmonid, Coregonus clupeaformis1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multiple forms of GnRH within individual brains may have different functions. However, some vertebrates such as salmonids continue to reproduce even though they have lost or do not express 1 of the 3 forms of GnRH found in most other teleosts. We examined a basal salmonid, lake whitefish, to determine the mechanism by which a reduction in the number of GnRH forms occurs. We identified for the first time 3 distinct GnRHs in a salmonid. One form is novel and is designated whitefish GnRH. The primary structure is pGlu-His-Trp-Ser-Tyr-Gly-Met-Asn-Pro-Gly-NH(2). HPLC and RIA were used for purification followed by Edman degradation for sequence determination. Mass spectroscopy was used to confirm the sequence and amidation of the peptide. The other 2 forms, salmon GnRH and chicken GnRH-II, are identical to the 2 forms found in salmon, which evolved later than whitefish. Synthetic whitefish GnRH is biologically active, as it increased mRNA expression of growth hormone and the alpha-subunit for LH and thyroid-stimulating hormone in dispersed fish pituitary cells. Our data support the hypothesis that the ancestral salmonid had a third GnRH form when the genome doubled (tetraploidization), but the third form was lost later in some salmonids due to chromosomal rearrangements. We suggest that the salmon GnRH form compensated for the loss of the third form.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".