MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112389321 · doi:10.3905/jpe.2009.12.3.104

Recent Case Law on Cross-Border Guarantees

2009· article· en· W2112389321 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Steven J. Weisz, Beth E Posno

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Private Equity · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTaxation and Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two recent cases decided under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act highlight some potential snares in coordinating U.S. and Canadian insolvency proceedings. In both cases, the Canadian debtors had guaranteed the obligations of their U.S. affiliates, in one case under a secured loan and in the other under a debtor in possession loan. These cases illustrate how the Canadian courts are dealing with the issue of cross-border guarantees and the extent to which they are concerned that the interests of Canadian unsecured creditors be considered. <bold>TOPICS:</bold> <ext-link>Private equity</ext-link>, <ext-link>legal/regulatory/public policy</ext-link>, <ext-link>developed</ext-link>, <ext-link>financial crises and financial market history</ext-link>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.848

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Private EquitySame topicTaxation and Legal IssuesFrench-language works237,207