MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112392046 · doi:10.1136/gut.2007.145573

Effect of binge drinking on the liver: an alarming public health issue?

2009· article· en· W2112392046 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Philippe Mathurin, Pierre Deltenre

Bibliographic record

VenueGut · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhenotypeAtaxiaCell biologyBiologySpinocerebellar ataxiaCerebellumCell adhesionNeuroscienceCellGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS) is caused by mutations in SACS, which manifest as a childhood-onset cerebellar ataxia. Cellular ARSACS phenotypes include mitochondrial dysfunction, intermediate filament (IF) disorganization, and loss of Purkinje neurons. It is unclear how the loss of SACS causes these deficits, or why they manifest as cerebellar ataxia. We employed a multi-omics approach to characterize molecular and cellular deficiencies in SACS knockout (KO) cells. We identified alterations in microtubule structure and dynamics, protein trafficking, and mislocalization of synaptic and focal adhesion proteins. Targeting PTEN, a negative regulator of focal adhesions, rescued several cellular phenotypes in SACS KO cells. We found sacsin interacts with proteins implicated in vesicle transport, including HSP proteins, and interactions between structural and cell adhesion proteins were diminished in SACS KO cells. In all, this study suggests that trafficking and localization of synaptic adhesion proteins is a causal molecular deficiency in ARSACS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations133
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGutSame topicAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsFrench-language works237,207