MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112437321 · doi:10.1017/s0263574706002700

On stabilization of bipedal robots during disturbed standing using the concept of Lyapunov exponents

2006· article· en· W2112437321 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRobotica · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Lyapunov exponentStability (learning theory)RobotLyapunov functionWork (physics)Balance (ability)Computer scienceBipedalismPosition (finance)Control (management)Lyapunov stabilityMathematicsNonlinear systemEngineeringArtificial intelligencePhysicsEconomicsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Design of balancing control and the stability analysis of a biped during disturbed standing are investigated. A PD-based switching state feedback control is used to stabilize the biped at the upright position while satisfying the constraints between the feet and the ground. The concept of Lyapunov exponents is used for the stability analysis, and a stability region is determined. Furthermore, the stability region is compared and agrees well with the one from the previous work that predicts the feasible movement during which balance of human standing can be maintained. This agreement shows the potential of the concept of Lyapunov exponents to be used as a measure of balancing of human standing. The work contributes to bipedal balancing control, which is important in the development of bipedal robots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it