MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112485404 · doi:10.1007/s10999-008-9067-1

Transient three dimensional finite element analysis of a bird striking a fan blade

2008· article· en· W2112485404 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
Canadian institutionsCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolid mechanicsFinite element methodCylinderGeometryBlade (archaeology)Nonlinear systemConstitutive equationStructural engineeringMechanicsDeformation (meteorology)Transient (computer programming)MathematicsEngineeringPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A comprehensive three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analyses were carried out to examine the effects of the geometry and the incidence angle of canonical 4-lb bird striking a stationary fan blade using LS-DYNA. Three aspects of the work were accordingly examined. The first was concerned with the modeling framework used. The second with the constitutive law that governs the behaviour of the bird. The third was concerned with the influence of the geometry and the angle of incidence of the bird on the integrity of the blade. This article combines and extends the earlier works on both the Lagrangian modeling methodology (Mao et al. AIAA J. Aircr. 44 (2), 583–596, 2007) and the bird geometry studies (Meguid et al. 2008) in systematic and integrated manner. Both the bird and the blade were simulated in a Lagrangian framework. Furthermore, the homogenized fluidic constitutive equation of the bird follows the Brockman hydrodynamic model, while the blade is modeled as a viscoplastic material of the Perzyna type. The study focused on the three most-frequently used configurations in the literature; namely, hemispherical-ended cylinder, straight-ended cylinder, and ellipsoid, at various length-to-diameter aspect ratios. The results show that the initial contact area between the bird and target in the early phase of the impact event would have a significant effect on the peak impact force. Normal incidence results in maximum impact forces and plastic strains leading to severe deformation. For the case where the incidence angle is equal to or larger than 60°, the impact forces are significantly reduced and the blade deformation remains within the elastic range. The maximum impact force and the resulting plastic strain are not merely governed by the size of the bird but also its density.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it