Identification of 14-3-3𝛉 as an Antigen that Induces a Humoral Response in Lung Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have implemented a strategy to identify tumor antigens that induce a humoral immune response in lung cancer based on the analysis of tumor cell proteins. Chromatographically fractionated protein extracts from three lung cancer cell lines were subjected to Western blotting and hybridization with individual sera to determine serum antibody binding. Two sets of sera were initially investigated. One set consisted of sera from 19 newly diagnosed subjects with lung adenocarcinoma and 19 matched controls. A second independent set consisted of sera from 26 newly diagnosed subjects with lung adenocarcinoma and 24 controls matched for age, gender, and smoking history. One protein that exhibited significant reactivity with both sets of cancer sera (P = 0.0008) was confidently identified by mass spectrometry as 14-3-3 theta. Remarkably, significant autoantibody reactivity against 14-3-3 theta was also observed in an analysis of a third set consisting of 18 prediagnostic lung cancer sera collected as part of the Beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial cohort study, relative to 19 matched controls (P = 0.0042). A receiver operating characteristic curve constructed with a panel of three proteins consisting of 14-3-3 theta identified in this study, plus annexin 1 and protein gene product 9.5 proteins previously identified as associated with autoantibodies in lung cancer, gave a sensitivity of 55% at 95% specificity (area under the curve, 0.838) in discriminating lung cancer at the preclinical stage from matched controls.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".