The Exploration of the Root-source of the Chinese Music “ Er Quan Ying Yue”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper tries to explore the root-source of the Chinese music “ Er Quan Ying Yue”. It recalls the life background of the composer, the blind man A Bing and the background of his music career. The paper tries to prove that the contents and style of the music are closely related to the composer’s life experiences, and the vivid music image is just the reflection of the composer’s tragic life and beautiful dream. Key words: “Er Quan Ying Yue”, A Bing, root-source Resume: L’article present tente d’explorer la source de la musique chinoise “Er Quan Ying Yue”. Il evoque la vie du compositeur, l’aveugle A Bing, et sa carriere de musicien. l’auteur essaie de prouver que le contenu et le style de la musique sont etroitement lies a l’experience de vie du compositeur, et que l’image musicale vivante est justement le reflet de la vie tragique et du beau reve du compositeur. Mots-Cles: “Er Quan Ying Yue”, A Bing, source
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".