MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112517358 · doi:10.1149/2.054212jes

Visualizing Liquid Water Evolution in a PEM Fuel Cell Using Synchrotron X-ray Radiography

2012· article· en· W2112517358 on OpenAlexafffund
James Hinebaugh, J. Lee, Aimy Bazylak

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Research Council CanadaWestern Economic Diversification CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Research FoundationCanadian Light Source
KeywordsAnodeProton exchange membrane fuel cellCathodeMaterials scienceSynchrotronElectrolyteMembrane electrode assemblyElectrodePorosityAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MembraneComposite materialChemistryOpticsChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synchrotron X-ray radiography was utilized to study the time evolution of liquid water in an operating polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell. A high aspect ratio fuel cell designed with offset anode and cathode flow field channels was operated at conditions that produced critical water management issues. The X-ray beam was directed along the plane of the fuel cell, and was therefore employed to elucidate the through-plane distribution of liquid water in the porous materials. Due to the offset between the anode and cathode gas channels, the membrane electrode assembly exhibited sinusoidal warping, and liquid water accumulated in possible areas of delamination. Liquid water first appeared near the cathode catalyst layer, and then traveled laterally within the porous gas diffusion layer. The experiment provides a basis for future design considerations, including membrane thickness and attenuation estimates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207