MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112522873 · doi:10.7202/600851ar

Pourquoi le Québec n’a pas (encore) de politique nataliste?

2008· article· fr· W2112522873 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Hervé Gauthier

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers québécois de démographie · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsBusiness Development Bank of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis 1970, l’indice synthétique de fécondité est inférieur au seuil de remplacement des générations, soit 2,1 enfants par femme. En dépit de ce phénomène inquiétant dans une société habituée à compter sur ses propres forces pour se renouveler, le Québec ne possède pas de politique nataliste. L’auteur examine un certain nombre de difficultés auxquelles l’adoption d’une telle politique doit faire face. Quatre types de difficultés sont passées en revue : des connaissances insuffisantes sur le phénomène de la baisse de la fécondité mais aussi sur les conséquences de cette évolution, les effets incertains des actions envisagées et la nécessité de concilier des objectifs très divers. L’auteur termine en proposant que l’État ait un objectif minimum, soit le remplacement des générations, qui pourrait faire partie de ses grandes orientations politiques. Il faudrait aussi promouvoir une politique familiale la plus complète possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.013
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers québécois de démographieSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207