Beneficial effects of direct foliar water uptake on shoot water potential of five chasmophytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Five chasmophytic species growing as wall-fissure plants on vertical retaining walls of a castle in the town of Patras, Greece, were examined for their ability to benefit from direct absorption of foliar surface water. Epifluore scence microscopy and application of an apoplastic tracer of water movement indicated that sprayed water on leaf surfaces penetrated into the mesophyll of all species, and in some cases was also detected within conducting tissues of the leaf. Water potential (Ψw) of sprayed detached shoots was improved compared with unsprayed controls when they were slowly losing water under laboratory conditions. The beneficial effect of leaf water absorption on Ψw was found either on leaves that were originally fully turgid or on leaves that had undergone a considerable water content reduction. Sprayed leaves maintained their Ψw above turgor loss point for a time period of 10-90 min depending on species and degree of water deficiency. The relevance of the results to the importance of dew uptake from chasmophytes growing under water shortage in wall fissures in inhabited areas is discussed.Key words: chasmophytes, leaf water absorption, wall vegetation, drought resistance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".