Multiple Imaginings of Institutional Identity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1996-1997, the author conducted research at the Hanson Institute of Psychiatry, a large psychiatric research hospital in a North American city. The author came to understand that there was a desire on the part of some senior managers to cultivate a loyalty and a sense of responsibility among staff to a singular institutional identity. This issue frames this article, drawing on anthropological understandings of the idea of culture, Martin’s fragmentation model, Maffesoli’s ideas of the social imaginary, and Goffman’s discussion of the individual perspective of an organization from “in the cracks.” The author discusses the nested imaginings that any individual would have if one considers the institutional; professional, departmental, or occupational; and individual imaginaries that fuelled employees’ ideas of the institution. There could be no real imagining of “the Hanson” because individuals imagined they worked for “a Hanson,” each imagining a slightly different institution from “in the cracks.”
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it