MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112602904 · doi:10.3354/esr00163

Metabolism of ingested lipids by North Atlantic right whales

2008· article· en· W2112602904 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Zachary T. Swaim, AJ Westgate, HN Koopman, Rosalind M. Rolland, Scott D. Kraus

Bibliographic record

VenueEndangered Species Research · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Marine Fisheries ServiceDalhousie UniversityUniversity of North Carolina WilmingtonNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationFisheries and Oceans CanadaInternational Fund for Animal Welfare
KeywordsRight whaleCalanus finmarchicusWhaleCalanusBayBiologyCopepodWhalingZoologyFisheryOceanographyCrustacean

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ESR Endangered Species Research Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsSpecials ESR 6:259-271 (2009) - DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00163 Metabolism of ingested lipids by North Atlantic right whales Zachary T. Swaim1,2, Andrew J. Westgate1,2, Heather N. Koopman1,2,*, Rosalind M. Rolland3, Scott D. Kraus3 1University of North Carolina Wilmington, 601 S. College Rd., Wilmington, North Carolina 28403, USA 2Grand Manan Whale and Seabird Research Station, Grand Manan, New Brunswick E5G 1A1, Canada 3New England Aquarium, Central Wharf, Boston, Massachusetts 02110, USA *Corresponding author: Email: koopmanh@uncw.edu ABSTRACT: North Atlantic right whales Eubalaena glacialis feed predominantly on Calanus finmarchicus Stage V copepods. Calanus possesses 2 classes of storage lipids, triacylglycerols (TAG) and wax esters (WE), the latter comprising 94% of total lipids. Most mammals are incapable of metabolizing WE and thus eliminate it in their feces. The objective of this study was to determine whether right whales are capable of metabolizing both TAG and WE. We compared the lipid composition of copepods collected during plankton tows (n = 64) over 2 summers (2006 and 2007) with the lipid composition of 24 right whale fecal samples collected synoptically in the Bay of Fundy. Using ingestion and defecation models, we estimated that an average right whale (40000 kg) ingests ~58000 g of WE d–1 but eliminates only 250 g of WE, implying that right whales are assimilating over 99% (57765 g) of dietary WE. Lipids in the feces differed significantly from those of the diet. Copepod lipids were dominated by saturated fatty acid (FA) components 14:0 (14.73 ± 0.32 wt%) and 16:0 (8.99 ± 0.20 wt%), with monounsaturated and polyunsaturated components comprising the remainder. Long chain monounsaturated 20:1n-9 and 22:1n-11 dominated the fatty alcohol composition of copepods. Fecal lipid composition consisted primarily of saturated FA, many of which were absent in the copepods. These data suggest that right whales have evolved an unusual metabolic capability, such as specialized enzymatic machinery or a gut symbiont, which, unlike other mammals, enables them to utilize most of their WE-rich diet. KEY WORDS: Eubalaena glacialis · Right whale · Lipid metabolism · Wax ester · Triacylglycerol · Calanus finmarchicus · Copepod · Feeding Full text in pdf format PreviousNextCite this article as: Swaim ZT, Westgate AJ, Koopman HN, Rolland RM, Kraus SD (2009) Metabolism of ingested lipids by North Atlantic right whales. Endang Species Res 6:259-271. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00163 Export citation Mail this link - Contents Mailing Lists - RSS Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in ESR Vol. 6, No. 3. Online publication date: February 04, 2009 Print ISSN: 1863-5407; Online ISSN: 1613-4796 Copyright © 2009 Inter-Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEndangered Species ResearchSame topicMarine animal studies overviewFrench-language works237,207