The metabolic syndrome: an emerging risk state for cardiovascular disease
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The common clustering of glucose intolerance, insulin resistance, abdominal adiposity, elevated blood pressure, and low HDL cholesterol is referred to as metabolic syndrome. Individuals with this syndrome have an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). The World Health Organisation and the National Cholesterol Education Programme's Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III) have outlined specific diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome to help in the identification of this syndrome in clinical practice. While the WHO criteria were specifically developed for use in research, the NCEP criteria are useful in clinical diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome. The metabolic syndrome is amenable to lifestyle modifications such as increased physical activity, weight loss, and possibly intake of low-glycemic foods. Drug therapy may be used to treat individual components of the syndrome such as elevated blood pressure and dyslipidemia. To control elevated glucose levels (when there is failure of lifestyle modification), medications such as metformin, thiazolidinedione derivatives and alpha glucosidase inhibitors may be used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.009 | 0.015 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it