MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112626643 · doi:10.1109/tec.2014.2342258

Constant-Parameter Voltage-Behind-Reactance Induction Machine Model Including Main Flux Saturation

2014· article· en· W2112626643 on OpenAlexafffund
Francis Therrien, Mehrdad Chapariha, Juri Jatskevich

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInterfacingReactanceControl theory (sociology)VoltageConstant (computer programming)Computer scienceTransient (computer programming)Flux (metallurgy)Saturation (graph theory)Control engineeringElectronic engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interfacing of electrical machine models with ac power networks has a significant impact on numerical accuracy and efficiency in state-variable-based transient simulation programs. This paper continues the recent work in this area by proposing a new explicit constant-parameter voltage-behind-reactance (VBR) induction machine model that includes main flux saturation and allows a direct interface to any external network. The proposed model uses numerical approximations to achieve a decoupled interfacing circuit with constant RL branches that is easy to use in many simulation programs. Computer studies demonstrate that the proposed model provides high numerical accuracy for machines with a diverse range of parameters, even at fairly large integration step sizes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Energy ConversionSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207