MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112646353 · doi:10.1109/isspit.2010.5711804

Blind Source Separation in nonminimum-phase systems based on filter decomposition

2010· article· en· W2112646353 on OpenAlexaff
Amin Kheradmand, Hamid Sheikhzadeh, Ebrahim Ghanavati

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlind signal separationFilter (signal processing)Frequency domainComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)DeconvolutionMixing (physics)Time domainSource separationAlgorithmBlind deconvolutionSpeech recognitionChannel (broadcasting)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on the causality problem in the task of Blind Source Separation (BSS) of speech signals in nonminimum-phase mixing channels. We propose a new algorithm for solving this problem using filter decomposition approach. Our proposed algorithm uses an integrated cost function in which independence criterion is defined in frequency-domain. The parameters of demixing system are derived in time-domain, so the algorithm has the benefits of both time and frequency-domain approaches. Compared to the previous work in this framework, our proposed algorithm is the extension of filter decomposition idea in multi-channel blind deconvolution to the problem of blind source separation of speech signals. The proposed method is capable of dealing with both minimum-phase and nonminimum-phase mixing situations. Simulation results show considerable improvement in separating speech signals specially when the mixing system is nonminimum-phase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207