MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112653007 · doi:10.1002/pssa.200674344

Brillouin light scattering from porous silicon films and multilayers

2007· article· en· W2112653007 on OpenAlexafffund
G. Todd Andrews, Anna Maria Polomska, É. Vázsonyi, János Volk

Bibliographic record

Venuephysica status solidi (a) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPorous siliconMaterials scienceBrillouin SpectroscopySiliconBrillouin zonePorosityRayleigh scatteringCrystalliteLayer (electronics)Brillouin scatteringPhononOpticsComposite materialCondensed matter physicsOptoelectronicsOptical fiber

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Porous silicon films and multilayers were studied using Brillouin spectroscopy. Acoustic wave velocities and elastic constants were determined for films with porosity ∼0.60 formed from p–, p+ and n+ crystalline silicon. The velocities and elastic constants depend on the pore/crystallite geometry and morphology. Porous silicon multilayers were fabricated from (100) p+ crystalline silicon. For a multilayer with 250 nm layer thickness and layer porosity sequence of 0.45/0.65/0.45/0.65/0.45, the Rayleigh surface phonon velocity was found to be 2850 m/s. The origin(s) of other peaks in the multilayer spectra are unknown but it is unlikely that they are surface modes because their shift(s) are independent of incident angle. (© 2007 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuephysica status solidi (a)Same topicSilicon Nanostructures and PhotoluminescenceFrench-language works237,207