Prostaglandin E <sub>2</sub> —Mediated Relaxation of the Ductus Arteriosus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the preterm newborn, a patent ductus arteriosus is in large part a result of the increased sensitivity of the immature ductus to prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). PGE2 acts through 3 G protein-coupled receptors (EP2, EP3, and EP4) that activate both adenyl cyclase and K(ATP) channels. We explored these pathways to identify the mechanisms responsible for the increased sensitivity of the immature ductus to PGE2. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured EP receptor content (mRNA and protein), receptor binding, cAMP production, and isometric tension in rings of ductus taken from immature (65% gestation) and mature (95% gestation) sheep and baboon fetuses. Ductus relaxation and cAMP generation were augmented in response to selective EP receptor agonists in the immature ductus. 8-Br-cAMP, a stable cAMP analogue, produced greater relaxation in the immature ductus. In the presence of a selective protein kinase A inhibitor, Rp-8-CPT cAMPS, the developmental differences in sensitivity to PGE2 could no longer be demonstrated. EP2, EP3, and EP4 receptor densities were higher in immature ductus, despite similar receptor mRNA and protein contents at the 2 gestational ages. In contrast, forskolin and NaF, direct activators of adenyl cyclase and Gs, respectively, elicited comparable increases in cAMP in both age groups. KATP channel inhibition also had similar effects on PGE2-induced relaxation in both age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Two mechanisms explain the increased sensitivity of the immature ductus to PGE2: (1) increased cAMP production because of increased binding of PGE2 to the individual EP receptors and (2) increased potency of cAMP on protein kinase A-regulated pathways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".