MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112675992 · doi:10.1017/s0263593300000122

The nature and origin of pegmatites in a fluorine-rich leucogranite, East Kemptville Tin Deposit, Nova Scotia, Canada

2001· article· en· W2112675992 on OpenAlexaffabout
Daniel J. Kontak, Kevin Ansdell, J. Dostál, Werner E. Halter, Robert F. Martin, Anthony E. Williams‐Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Earth Sciences · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversitySt. Mary's UniversitySaint Mary's UniversityUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPegmatiteLeucograniteCassiteriteGeologyMuscoviteGeochemistryTopazMicroclineAlbiteBatholithFelsicQuartzGneissMineralogyTinMetamorphic rockMaficMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Pegmatites at the East Kemptville Sn-Zn-Cu-Ag deposit occur within a F- and P-rich, 370 Ma topaz-muscovite leucogranite, the most evolved phase of the chemically zoned Davis Lake Pluton. Structural observations and geochronology indicate that the leucogranite intruded into an active shear/fault zone environment. Pegmatites are preferentially located near the roof zone of the intrusion and include: (1) quartz-feldspar pods (≤ 1–2 m) aligned parallel to a foliation in the leucogranite. Such pegmatites have marginal aplites or may be cored by aplites; (2) aplite-pegmatite zones with well-developed crenulate and unidirectional solidification textures; and (3) muscovite-bordered miarolitic cavities lined with quartz-feldspar ± cassiterite. Associated with areas of pegmatites are irregular- to cuspate-shaped zones enriched in muscovite. Mineralogically the pegmatites are simple, consisting of clear to black quartz, albite, microcline perthite and muscovite; topaz may be enriched in aplites coring pegmatites and coarse euhedral cassiterite is rare. Chemically the leucogranites marginal to pegmatites are similar to the host leucogranite, but some aphanitic felsic dykes indicate extreme differentiation, as reflected by REE depletion and P-enrichment. Enrichment of pegmatitic feldspar in P2O5 (to 1 wt. %) indicates that melts contained 2–3 wt. % P2O5, whereas muscovite chemistry (to 5 wt. % F) reflects the F-rich nature of the melt. Trace and REE contents of pegmatitic feldspars are consistent with local segregation of volatile-rich melts to form pegmatites rather than extreme crystal-chemical fractionation. Fluid inclusion studies of pegmatitic quartz and cassiterite indicate the presence of a highly saline brine (40 wt. % eq. NaCl; Na > K > Fe > Mn > Ca > Sr) of magmatic origin. Isochores modelled for a 40 wt. % eq. NaCl fluid constrain pegmatite formation at 550–600°C, thus the depressed solidus is consistent with the volatile-rich (F, P, H2O) nature of the melt. Stable isotopes demonstrate that a magmatic fluid (δ18OH2O = +5·5 to +10‰, δDH2O = −33 to −41‰ for 450–500°C) equilibrated with the pegmatites and the system cooled abruptly at c. 425°C. The low volume of pegmatite at East Kemptville suggests that the melt was not near volatile saturation, instead pegmatite generation is interpreted to have resulted from rapid decompression related to the active shear zone setting of the granite. Although feldspar chemistry reflects a local segregation model, the chemistry of aphanitic dyke rocks indicates that the leucogranite did evolve into a more fractionated melt. The local presence of cassiterite in pegmatites and miarolitic cavities indicates that locally, saturation of Sn occurred, but not throughout the EKL where elevated Sn contents are attributed to infiltration of mineralising fluids (i.e. deuteric alteration).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Earth SciencesSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207