MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112686536 · doi:10.5539/eer.v1n1p175

Innovation and Technology Management in Wind Energy Cluster

2011· article· en· W2112686536 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wagner Sousa de Oliveira, António Jorge Fernandes

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy and Environment Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicInnovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do MaranhãoUniversidade de Aveiro
KeywordsWind powerIncentiveEnergy securityEnvironmental economicsCluster (spacecraft)Field (mathematics)Computer scienceValue (mathematics)Energy managementIndustrial organizationBusinessPower (physics)Energy (signal processing)Risk analysis (engineering)Renewable energyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Innovation and technology management in wind energy industry is driven by policies and incentives due to their inherent characteristics such as high upfront costs, lack of level playing field but distinct advantages from energy security, environmental and social considerations. This paper makes an analysis of innovation and technology management in wind power industry, focusing on value chain and the interaction of technology and markets for contributing to recommendations on technology policy and management. This paper proposes a framework for analyzing the initial stage of diffusion of wind power systems, combining the use of various approaches, considering wind power system as a complex technology. The approach to the business system is used as an analytical framework, focusing on efficiency, effectiveness and criteria for development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.480
Threshold uncertainty score0.690

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.156
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy and Environment ResearchSame topicInnovation Diffusion and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207