Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le French Market à la Nouvelle-Orléans présente aux touristes contemporains qui se promènent dans le Vieux Carré une vision de la restauration à l’américaine. Derrière ces conceptions aménagistes se cachent également des significations imaginaires inspirées du passé qui entrent dans le champ du présent. La période du New Deal est très importante pour la transformation du French Market. Le discours général des années 1930 est un moment de légitimation d’une action urbanistique qui a entraîné la destruction d’une partie d’un site authentique et le gommage pur et simple d’un morceau de la trame urbaine. Le milieu d’affaires louisianais a exploité la manne touristique créée et entretenue par les Faiseurs d’Images du XIXe siècle, ces différents rédacteurs de guides, romanciers et mémorialistes. Ainsi, le marché français est censé représenter un style de vie à la française, sur un espace profondément modifié et bien différent de celui des origines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".