MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112725723 · doi:10.1139/s07-047

Characterization of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and conversion rate of sulfur dioxide to sulfate in inland areas of Taiwan

2008· article· en· W2112725723 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chuen-Liang Horng, Man‐Ting Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering and Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticulatesDaytimeSulfur dioxideEnvironmental scienceSulfateSulfurEnvironmental chemistryFlue-gas desulfurizationChemistryAtmospheric sciencesMineralogyHydrology (agriculture)Environmental engineeringGeologyInorganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to investigate the sulfur conversion rate and the characterization of PM2.5 particulate matter and acidic gases in inland Taiwan region. The measurements were taken at two different sites located near the fossil fuel power plant in central Taiwan. First site was Wufong and the other site was Nantou, which is located 15 km south from Wufong. PM2.5 and gaseous acids were measured by annular denuder system. PM2.5 ionic species including SO42–, NO3–, NH4+, Cl–, Ca2+, K+, Na+, and H+and gaseous HNO3 and HCl were analyzed. Results showed that the average ratio of PM2.5 and SO42– was higher during daytime, probably due to the anthropogenic activities. Wind field map also clearly displayed that Wufong was located upwind and Nantou was located downwind during daytime. Sulfur conversion ratio in the downwind site was higher than upwind site. Experimental data showed that sulfur conversion rate between these sites was 5%–9% h–1. The increased PM2.5 and SO2 concentrations recorded in the Nantou site were from the direction of Taichung city during daytime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.151
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Engineering and ScienceSame topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFrench-language works237,207