On-site diagnostic tests on medium voltage, XLPE-insulated power cables
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dc depolarization current measurement technique was used to test 20 medium voltage, underground XLPE-insulated cables in the local utility power distribution network between January and March 2006 and then in March 2007. The cables varied in length (30 m to ~1600 m), voltage rating (9 to 28 kV), and age (4 to 36 years). Unlike a typical depolarization current measurement where only a low frequency portion of the current is monitored with an electrometer, the described measurements have also included the high frequency component of the depolarization current, occurring right after switching off the poling voltage. The measurements in 2007 also included the dielectric loss factor measurements between 10 mHz and 500 Hz to correlate the tan delta values with the parameters of the depolarization currents. A reasonable correlation was found between cable age and other operating conditions and the depolarization current characteristics. A one year period between 2006 and 2007 produced noticeable changes in the depolarization current characteristics for some cable and almost no change in others. No consistent time effect on the insulation of various cables could be identified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".