MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112744568 · doi:10.1029/2002gl016401

Stratospheric ozone profiles retrieved from limb scattered sunlight radiance spectra measured by the OSIRIS instrument on the Odin satellite

2003· article· en· W2112744568 on OpenAlexaff
Christian von Savigny, C. S. Haley, Christopher E. Sioris, I. C. McDade, E. J. Llewellyn, D. A. Degenstein, W. F. J. Evans, R. L. Gattinger, E. Griffioen, E. Kyrölä, N. D. Lloyd, J. C. McConnell, C. A. McLinden, G. Mégie, D. Murtagh, B. H. Solheim, Kimberly Strong

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsTrent UniversityUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of TorontoYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadianceOsirisSatelliteEnvironmental scienceStratosphereRemote sensingOzone layerOzoneRadiative transferSunlightAtmospheric sciencesMeteorologyPhysicsGeologyOpticsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stratospheric ozone density profiles between 15 and 40 km altitude are derived from scattered sunlight limb radiance spectra measured with the Optical Spectrograph and InfraRed Imager System (OSIRIS) on the Odin satellite. The method is based on the analysis of limb radiance profiles in the centre and the wings of the Chappuis‐Wulf absorption bands of ozone. It employs a non‐linear Newtonian iteration version of Optimal Estimation (OE) coupled with the radiative transfer model LIMBTRAN. The derived zonally averaged ozone field for August 2001 is in excellent agreement with the main characteristics of the global morphology of stratospheric ozone, indicating that the limb scatter technique is capable of providing ozone profiles with high accuracy and high vertical resolution on a global scale and a daily basis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.619
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations110
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207