MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112766005 · doi:10.1002/bit.20286

Microplate‐based filter paper assay to measure total cellulase activity

2004· article· en· W2112766005 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiotechnology and Bioengineering · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCellulaseFilter paperTrichoderma reeseiChemical nomenclatureChemistryChromatographyFilter (signal processing)Sample (material)Analytical Chemistry (journal)EnzymeBiochemistryComputer scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The standard filter paper assay (FPA) published by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) is widely used to determine total cellulase activity. However, the IUPAC method is not suitable for the parallel analyses of large sample numbers. We describe here a microplate-based method for assaying large sample numbers. To achieve this, we reduced the enzymatic reaction volume to 60 microl from the 1.5 ml used in the IUPAC method. The modified 60-microl format FPA can be carried out in 96-well assay plates. Statistical analyses showed that the cellulase activities of commercial cellulases from Trichoderma reesei and Aspergillus species determined with our 60-microl format FPA were not significantly different from the activities measured with the standard FPA. Our results also indicate that the 60-microl format FPA is quantitative and highly reproducible. Moreover, the addition of excess beta-glucosidase increased the sensitivity of the assay by up to 60%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.732

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it