MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112770787 · doi:10.4141/cjps10132

72P01 CL Clearfield herbicide-tolerant spring canola

2011· article· en· W2112770787 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
H. Rahman, G. R. Stringam, Dani Degenhardt

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicComposting and Vermicomposting Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCanolaBrassicaCultivarAgronomyBiologySpring (device)Yield (engineering)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rahman, H., Stringam, G. R. and Degenhardt, D. F. 2011. 72P01 CL Clearfield herbicide-tolerant spring canola. Can J. Plant Sci. 91: 527–528. 72P01 CL is a Clearfield herbicide-tolerant canola-quality Brassica napus L. cultivar registered in Canada in 2007. On average, 72P01 CL yielded 7% more seed and flowered 2 d earlier than the WCC/RRC check cultivars. Seed oil and meal protein content of 72P01 CL are similar to the WCC/RRC checks. Thus, 72P01 CL combines high seed yield with earliness of flowering, while retaining other desired traits at an acceptable level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score0.952

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicComposting and Vermicomposting TechniquesFrench-language works237,207