La République des Lettres au féminin. Femmes et circulation des savoirs au XVIII siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
circulation des savoirs au XVIII e sicle Comment s'expliquer qu'au XXI e sicle on puisse encore crire sur le mouvement des Lumires comme si les femmes n'existaient pas, sans se proccuper de la place qu'elles ont pu y tenir ou mme en dclarant d'emble qu'elles n'ont pu y en avoir aucune, sinon de sympathie ou d'opposition? En mme temps, il est peu de termes plus en vogue actuellement que celui de femme des Lumires -et tout rcemment mme de filles, hlas! Mais la plupart du temps, il ne semble pas du tout s'agir alors de marquer une appartenance, tout au plus une concomitance : elles se trouvent avoir vcu cette poque-l, voil tout. Si par contre, on veut dsigner ainsi une femme qui, par son activit, sa faon de penser, s'inscrit dans le mouvement d'ouverture et de libration que s'est voulu le courant des Lumires, on comprend qu'
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".