Incremental local community identification in dynamic social networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Social networks are usually drawn from the interactions between individuals, and therefore are temporal and dynamic in essence. Examining how the structure of these networks changes over time provides insights into their evolution patterns, factors that trigger the changes, and ultimately predict the future structure of these networks. One of the key structural characteristics of networks is their community structure --groups of densely interconnected nodes. Communities in a dynamic social network span over periods of time and are affected by changes in the underlying population, i.e. they have fluctuating members and can grow and shrink over time. In this paper, we introduce a new incremental community mining approach, in which communities in the current time are obtained based on the communities from the past time frame. Compared to previous independent approaches, this incremental approach is more effective at detecting stable communities over time. Extensive experimental studies on real datasets, demonstrate the applicability, effectiveness, and soundness of our proposed framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it