MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112812040 · doi:10.1039/c2ay05627e

A simple system for the measurement of the distribution of activities of individual molecules of E. coli β-galactosidase

2011· article· en· W2112812040 on OpenAlexaff
Douglas B. Craig

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Methods · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOperator (biology)Simple (philosophy)PopulationDistribution (mathematics)Biological systemFluorescenceMoleculeChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Beta-galactosidaseSyringeTube (container)LaserEscherichia coliMaterials scienceChromatographyBiochemistryPhysicsBiologyOpticsEngineeringMathematicsMathematical analysisOrganic chemistryMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A simple system capable of measuring the distribution of single molecule activities of a population of E. coli β-galactosidase was developed. This system utilized a modified disposable syringe, a narrow bore capillary tube and an in-laboratory constructed laser-induced fluorescence detection system. Once started, the experiment can continue to collect data without any operator input for more than 24 h. The relative catalytic rates of 138 individual molecules of the enzyme were determined. The distribution of activities was found to be indistinguishable from that reported using more complicated methodologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical MethodsSame topicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207