Mieux comprendre la capacité fonctionnelle du coeur et mieux intervenir dans la progestion des comportements spécifiques d’autosoins de la personne atteinte d’une maladie coronarienne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les chercheurs reconnaissent que l’adoption de comportements spécifiques d’autosoins peut freiner, modifier ou retarder la progression de la maladie coronarienne. L’infirmière doit assumer un rôle de facilitatrice de comportements de santé pour aider la personne atteinte d’une maladie coronarienne à adopter de saines habitudes de vie. Pour ce faire, l’infirmière doit comprendre la capacité fonctionnelle du coeur chez la personne atteinte d’une maladie coronarienne afin de la guider vers un niveau d’activités physiques efficace et sécuritaire. Elle a la responsabilité de connaître les différents comportements que la personne doit adopter afin de maintenir ou d’améliorer sa santé cardiaque, par exemple, le non-usage du tabac. L’infirmière observe alors la personne aux prises avec des changements afin de déterminer son évolution à travers les stades comportementaux de manière à mieux adapter ses interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".