MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Government Behavior and Sustainable Development in Regional Economy COMPORTEMENT GOUVERNEMENTAL ET DÉVELOPPEMENT DURABLE DE L'ÉCONOMIE RÉGIONALE

2009· article· fr· W2112848959 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hui-chun Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegional developmentPolitical scienceSustainable developmentEconomyRealisationGovernment (linguistics)HumanitiesWelfare economicsEconomicsRegional scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to problems such as area segmentation and regional blockade, unbalanced development between regional economies, the decreasing dependency among regional economies, the development of regional economy have faced many obstacles. It is necessary and of great significance to strengthen the government management in developing and promoting sustainable development in regional economies. This article approaches from analyzing the main problems facing sustainable development in regional economies, explores the necessary conditions to realize sustainable development and gives suggestions from the perspective of government to promote sustainable development. Key words: government, regional economy, sustainable development Resume: A cause de la division et le blocus regionaux, le desequilibre du developpement economique regional, l’affaiblissement de la dependance des regions, le developpement de l’economie regionale presente beaucoup de problemes. Ainsi, le renforcement de la supervision gouvernementale revet une signification considerable pour promouvoir la prosperite de l’economie regionale et son developpement durable. Le present article, commencant par l’analyse des problemes principaux existant dans le developpement durable de l’economie regionale de notre pays, explore les conditions necessaires a la realisation du developpement durable de l’economie regionale, et propose des conseils politiques du point de vue du gouvernement. Mots-Cles: gouvernement, economie regionale, developpement regional

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social science→Same topicFiscal Policy and Economic Growth→French-language works237,207→