Delay-Based Admission Control Using Fuzzy Logic for OFDMA Broadband Wireless Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we present a fuzzy logic-based admission control algorithm for orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA)-based broadband wireless networks. The system under consideration is compatible with the IEEE 802.16 standard in the TDD-OFDMA mode of operation. The proposed admission control algorithm considers various traffic source parameters (i.e., normal rate, peak rate and probability of peak rate) and packet-level delay requirements for the traffic to decide whether an incoming connection can be accepted or not. We formulate a queueing model to investigate the impacts of physical layer parameters (e.g., channel quality and number of allocated subchannels) on the radio link layer performances (e. g., average queue length, delay and throughput). The inference rules for resource allocation in the proposed fuzzy logic admission control are defined based on these queueing performance measures. The performance of the proposed admission control algorithm is analyzed by simulations and also compared to those of the traditional schemes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it