Vessel-Specific Stimulation of Protein Synthesis by Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although conduit arteries develop hypertrophy after chronic NO synthesis blockade, resistance arteries remodel without hypertrophy under the same conditions. Similar findings have been described in essential hypertension. We postulated that this regional difference may be related to a heterogeneous effect of endogenous NO on proliferation along the vascular tree. Newly synthesized proteins were radiolabeled in vivo with [(3)H]L-leucine in basal conditions and during NO synthase inhibition, with or without PD98059 (inhibitor of the extracellular signal-regulated kinases [ERK] 1/2). Blocking the generation of NO by 3 different L-arginine analogues increased protein synthesis by an average of 75% in the aorta, in association with enhanced ERK 1/2 phosphorylation. PD98059 significantly reduced L-arginine analogue-induced protein synthesis and ERK 1/2 phosphorylation, confirming the involvement of ERK 1/2 as an important signaling element. In small arteries, L-arginine analogues did not influence the extent of protein synthesis, although phosphorylation of ERK 1/2 was also enhanced. To determine the role of NO in a condition of enhanced protein synthesis, angiotensin II was infused for 24 hours. Angiotensin II augmented protein synthesis in mesenteric arteries and the aorta, and was additive to NO synthase blockade in the aorta. In conclusion, endogenous NO exerts a tonic inhibitory influence on aortic growth, with limited impact on small arteries in basal and hypertrophic conditions. This heterogeneous role of NO on vascular growth may explain the heterogeneity of vascular remodeling observed in essential hypertension, a condition associated with endothelial dysfunction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".