MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112985541 · doi:10.7202/013606ar

Les victimes d’abus sexuels confrontées à la souffrance et à la violence de la Passion

2006· article· fr· W2112985541 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jean-Guy Nadeau, Carole Golding, Claude Rochon

Bibliographic record

VenueThéologiques · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Society, and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les croyances religieuses offrent en principe des ressources pour faire face aux événements traumatisants, mais il y a aussi des cas où elle en accroît le traumatisme ou en retarde la résolution. L’article rend compte de l’expérience de victimes d’abus sexuels durant l’enfance face à la Passion de Jésus. La réflexion s’organise autour des pôles de l’identification et de l’imitation de la figure de Jésus. Non seulement le discours traditionnel chrétien peut-il s’avérer délétère pour les victimes, mais les nombreuses approches critiques développées au vingtième siècle s’avèrent fréquemment insuffisantes pour les victimes. Il demeure donc impératif de développer une christologie qui refuse le statut de volonté divine à la souffrance et à la violence dont elle est souvent issue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThéologiquesSame topicReligion, Society, and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207