MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112989303 · doi:10.1139/s04-033

Décoloration des eaux usées de levurerie par adsorption sur charbon

2004· article· en· W2112989303 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Faouzi Ben Tahar, Ridha Ben Cheikh, Jean-François Blais

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering and Science · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdsorptionChemistryFreundlich equationActivated charcoalWastewaterSaturation (graph theory)CharcoalDissolved organic carbonChemical oxygen demandActivated carbonLangmuirEnvironmental chemistryOrganic matterChromatographyNuclear chemistryPulp and paper industryEnvironmental engineeringOrganic chemistryEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The decolorization study of a yeast wastewater factory by adsorption on activated and raw charcoal showed that these adsorbents have great capacity to discolor and to adsorb the total organic matter (TOM), the chemical oxygen demand (COD), and the dissolved organic carbon (DOC). The solutions color characteristics have been followed by determining their dominant wavelengths issued from their correspondent trichromatic coefficients (X,Y,Z). The adsorbent size is an important parameter. The use of 30 g of charcoal sized 150–250 µm, per liter of solution, leads to a total decolorization, and to a diminution of up to 50% of the treated solutions COD and DOC concentrations. To obtain the same efficiency, 130 g/L of 425- to 850-µm sized charcoal are needed. The study of the kinetics of the discoloration shows that the adsorbent instantly reaches a saturated state with a saturation rate almost equivalent to the rate of its diffusion in the liquid. It shows also that the maximum amounts of the adsorption of the COD and the DOC can be modelled by the Langmuir adsorption isotherm, and that they are respectively equal to 231 and 213 mg/g for the nonactivated charcoal (150–250 µm), and 103 mg/g for the activated charcoal (425–850 µm) regarding the COD, and that the Freundlich adsorption model fit well the COD and DOC adsorption for the nonactivated charcoal. Key words: decolorization, charcoal, adsorption, yeast, wastewater.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Engineering and ScienceSame topicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalFrench-language works237,207