MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113047319

Technological Paradigms and the Measurement of Innovation

2000· preprint· en· W2113047319 on OpenAlexaff
Bernard Sinclair‐Désgagné

Bibliographic record

VenueÉrudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal) · 2000
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy and History of Science
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPropositionTechnological changeEpistemologyProduct (mathematics)HumanitiesPhilosophyEconomicsNeoclassical economicsSociologyWelfare economicsMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article propose une définition formelle de la notion de paradigme technologique. Cette définition s'avère compatible avec la proposition fondamentale de l'approche Kuhnienne du développement scientifique, à l'effet que le progrès à long terme des connaissances ne survient que grâce à de brusques changements de paradigme. La présente définition permet aussi de clarifier plusieurs notions, comme celle d'innovation tirée par la demande ou bien poussée par l'offre, d'innovation incrémentale ou bien radicale, ou encore de générations de produits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉrudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)Same topicPhilosophy and History of ScienceFrench-language works237,207