Rorty, Nabokov et le refus de la cruauté : prolégomènes à une éthique de l’écriture théologique*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet essai aborde la question d’une théologisation possible-impossible de la figure du « héros culturel » dessinée par le philosophe américain Richard Rorty : celui qu’il appelle « l’ironiste libéral ». Après une brève évocation du « tournant esthétique » lié à l’avènement de la figure de l’« ironiste libéral », l’auteur s’attache à l’examen du « sécularisme » de Rorty et à l’identification des principales résistances que ce philosophe pose aux tentatives visant à relativiser (ou à contester) l’opposition entre « discours ironiste » et « discours théologique ». L’auteur s’efforce ensuite de dégager les conditions d’accession de l’ironiste au statut de « libéral » et, par là, de « héros culturel » auquel Rorty le destine — reprenant, à cette fin, la lecture du roman Lolita de Vladimir Nabokov proposée dans Contingency, Irony and Solidarity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".