MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113087898 · doi:10.1109/milcom.1999.821352

An algorithmic approach to preamble sequence optimization

2003· article· en· W2113087898 on OpenAlexaff
Robert W. Johnson, M. Jorgenson, Blythe Moreland

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmPseudorandom number generatorComputer scienceSequence (biology)PreambleSynchronization (alternating current)Set (abstract data type)Complementary sequencesChannel (broadcasting)MathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When using coherent demodulation techniques, it is often necessary to include sequences of known symbols within the transmission in order to facilitate synchronization and, when advanced equalization algorithms are employed, channel estimation. In many cases it is possible to employ well-known sequences with desirable properties for use in synchronization. In some cases, however, to remove the overt signature that the repeated use of these known sequences causes, pseudo-random sequences are required. The conventional method of choosing such pseudo-random sequences relies on an exhaustive search algorithm. However, the computational requirements for a search of moderate length sequences are immense. In practice, for sequences of moderate length, the usual procedure is to evaluate sequences generated at random against several well-defined criteria. We present a computationally efficient method for deriving PSK sequences with good properties for signal detection and channel estimation. From an initial random sequence, a gradient descent algorithm is used to iteratively improve the sequence, based on the evaluation criteria. This algorithmic approach is shown to reduce the time required to generate a set of sequences, meeting the specified performance criteria, by more than two orders of magnitude in some cases. The method is particularly applicable to the design of pseudorandom sequences for preamble and training segments in serial-tone HF waveforms. Although the technique is general in nature, examples provided focus on the design of 8PSK sequences for serial-tone HF waveforms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207