MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113101493 · doi:10.1029/2008ja013059

Solar‐minimum quiet time ion energization and outflow in dynamic boundary related coordinates

2008· article· en· W2113101493 on OpenAlexaff
W. K. Peterson, L. Andersson, B. Callahan, H. L. Collin, J. D. Scudder, A. W. Yau

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsNoonIonosphereQUIETEarth's magnetic fieldPolarIonOutflowSolar minimumAstrophysicsNorthern HemisphereRing currentAtmospheric sciencesGeophysicsComputational physicsSolar windMagnetic fieldAstronomyMeteorologySolar cycle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report hemispheric average fluxes and energies of outflowing energetic (0.015 < E/q < 33 keV) H + , O + , and He + ions in dynamic boundary‐related coordinates, from observations obtained by the Polar/TIMAS instrument near 6000 km altitude in the southern hemisphere during quiet geomagnetic intervals at solar minimum. We discuss our observations in terms of known energization and transport processes. We find that only a small fraction of energetic ions escape from the ionosphere directly into the polar cap and at quiet times the characteristic energies of escaping H + are between 30 and 300 eV in the cusp region and between 30 eV and 1.2 keV in the midnight sector. For O + we conclude the characteristic energy in the cusp is ∼100 eV and between 150 and 600 eV in the midnight sector. Our data suggest that the relative energization and acceleration of O + is significantly different in the noon quadrant. The observations and analysis presented here also suggest that O + has activity dependent transport paths from the ionosphere to the ring current that have not previously been identified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.308
Threshold uncertainty score0.798

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207